APENDICULAR PLASTRON PDF

Appendicular mass and current clinic management : A decision to reconsiderate. About a case. Rev Chil Cir [online]. ISSN Introduction: Appendicitis is one of the main reasons for consultation and surgery in the emergency department. There is currently no consensus on the treatment of appendicular plastron, therefore, the objective of this work is to support and promote alternative deferred surgical versus medical management, as the most suitable treatment of appendiceal plastron.

Author:Malat Kijinn
Country:Mexico
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Spiritual
Published (Last):14 September 2019
Pages:47
PDF File Size:14.32 Mb
ePub File Size:10.17 Mb
ISBN:831-5-52871-118-8
Downloads:76615
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Vorn



The medical approach of patients who present an appendicular plastron arouses multiple controversies and divides surgical world according to the preferred type of management: conservatory or surgically. We discuss the case of a year-old male, with Imipenem allergy, without significant medical history, who presents with pain in the right iliac fossa and in the right lumbar region, nausea and vomiting. The CT scans revealed an appendicular bloc near the terminal portion of the ileon and the dilation of the appendix.

On the 10th day it was decided to perform a surgical intervention for abscess drainage under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. An immediate appendectomy was prohibited. After one month, the patient presented for the clinical and imagistic follow-up evaluation. The CT scan did not reveal any peritoneal collections or the vermicular appendix.

After a successful conservative treatment associated or not with abscess drainage, a subsequent appendectomy is not necessary, although the patient must be informed about the recurrence risk. The probability of missing an insidious pathology is low, although it should not be excluded, especially for patients over 40 years old.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Home Current Issue Archive , Vol. Authors Submit a manuscript Instructions to authors Authors declarations Acknowledgements to Reviewers.

Full text sources. Previous Article Post-operatory contra-lateral incidental imaging finding following laparoscopic surgery for adrenal Cushing syndrome. Next Article Persistent post-operative hypoparathyroidism: Cardiac and psychiatric co-morbidities need to be correlated with vitamin D and calcium replacement.

By admin. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More. Necessary Always Enabled.

HANS MORGENTHAU POLITICA ENTRE LAS NACIONES PDF

appendicular plastron

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page. Language: French English. Our study aimed to evaluate the outcome of the surgical treatment of appendicular plastron after deferred or emergency appendectomy. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study of 27 patients treated for appendicular plastron from January to 31 December Diagnosis was based on clinical examination showing a mass in the right iliac fossa, on ultrasound or made intraoperatively.

CARPENITO VERPLEEGKUNDIGE DIAGNOSEN PDF

[Evolutive Particularities of Appendicular Plastron in Children]

Appendicular abscess is considered the most common complication of acute appendicitis , in particular after a perforated appendix. Appendicular abscesses can arise either in the peritoneal cavity or the retroperitoneal space. Ultrasound is the first investigation advised to evaluate a suspected appendicular pathology. Findings of an appendicular abscess include:.

LKPR CHARTS PDF

Particullary evolution of a patient with appendicular plastron

This paper analyses the experience of the Paediatric Surgery Department from the Emergency Hospital in Craiova regarding the clinical and therapeutical evaluation of 55 cases with appendicular plastron admitted in our department between We analyse both the evolution and the complications in managing these cases, together with particular aspects of differential diagnosis related to this group of age. These 55 cases were children aged between 2 and 15 years with a 15 days average hospitalization period. Comparative to a study realised in our dept. This site needs JavaScript to work properly.

Related Articles